|
Overview
| Day 1
| Day 2
| Day 3
| Download
Brochure | Breakout
Discussions
MAIN CONFERENCE
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25
7:15am Registration Open and Morning Coffee
8:45 Plenary Keynote Introduction
Kathryn Lowell, Deputy Secretary, Life Sciences,
California Business Transportation & Housing Agency
8:55 Plenary Keynote
Therapy
Development in a Networked World
Jay M. Tenenbaum, Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Scientist, CollabRx, Inc.
A new paradigm for translational research will be described that combines the
integrative and collaborative power of the Internet with personalized
molecular analysis to slash the time and cost of therapy development. A
key element is the creation of Health Commons, an open
web-based ecosystem of researchers, clinicians, patients, pharma/biotechs, and
service/technology providers that can be rapidly mobilized to develop targeted
therapies for disease subclasses. This ecosystem will stimulate the same
radical increase in efficiency for therapy development that ecommerce brought
to business in the 1990s, ushering in a new age of collaborative, personalized
medicine where every patient can afford custom therapies and discovery is
driven by collectively interpreting the outcomes across all patients.
9:40 Grand Opening Refreshment Break in the
Exhibit Hall
KEYNOTE PERSPECTIVE
11:00 Chairperson’s Remarks
11:10 Challenges and Opportunities in 21st Century Safety Testing
William B. Mattes, Ph.D., D.A.B.T., Director of Toxicology, The Critical Path Institute
-
The “-omic” technologies will
truly bear fruit as a means for discovering, translating,
and confirming novel biomarkers and safety testing
approaches
-
21st Century safety testing will
rediscover itself as “Translational Toxicology”, i.e.
translating findings in animal studies to measurable risks
in humans through the use of novel, translational,
non-invasive biomarkers
-
Regulatory agencies will play a much more engaged and important role in shaping and approving new safety testing strategies
CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY EVALUATION
11:40 Cardiotoxicity Screening: Cardiomyocytes and Engineered Cell Lines
Craig T. January, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison
This presentation focuses on cardiotoxicity approaches that couples engineered cell lines and stem cell derived cardiomyocytes with multiple screening methods. Electrophysiologic, biochemical and immunohistologic modalities will be discussed.
12:10pm What is Acceptable Cardiotoxicity Risk for a Preclinical Small Molecule Drug Candidate
Shayne Gad, Ph.D., Gad Consulting
The range of potential mechanisms of drug cardiotoxicity
will be considered with examples - it isn’t just QTc anymore.
The components of a cardiovascular risk/therapeutic benefit
matrix for a new pharmaceutical as well as more effectively
identifying and quantifying cardiovascular risk in the
nonclinical phase will be discussed.
|
12:40 Discover Potential Targets and
Drug Effects Using an Integrative, Knowledge-Rich, Approach
Nikolai Daraselia, Ph.D., Senior Director of Research, Ariadne
By elucidating knowledge on existing drugs/drug candidates garnered from published findings, Pathway Studio® can help support portfolio management for drug and lead compounds, facilitate decision workflows and experimental designs based on findings and find novel biological relationships including potentially new drug targets and drug side effects.
Educational Needs/Learning Objectives:
-
Learn how to extract biological relationships from multiple scientific resources including PubMed/PubChem
-
Use findings to help structure experimental designs
-
“See” functional relationships
in interactive pathways and compare them with recent
scientific findings
|
Sponsored by
|
12:55
Following
the Critical Path: Development of Multi-Analyte Profiles
for Sensitive, Early Detection of Toxicity
Ralph L. McDade, Ph.D., Strategic Development
Officer, Rules-Based Medicine, Inc.
Sensitive and specific toxicity testing provides for
more efficient drug development processes.
Rules-Based Medicine provides a biomarker testing
service that utilizes comprehensive, quantitative
immunoassay panels called Multi-Analyte Profiles (MAPs).
Several successful projects will be described with
emphasis on one involving the Critical Path Initiative’s
Predictive Safety Testing Consortium. This example,
describing a rat nephrotoxicity MAP, demonstrates the
utility of this rapid, cost-effective biomarker
approach.
|
Sponsored
by:

|
1:10 Walk & Talk Luncheon in the Exhibit Hall
EVALUATING AND IMPROVING PRE-CLINICAL MODELS: ARE THEY PREDICTIVE OF HUMAN RESPONSE?
(combined with Translational Medicine Track)
2:15 Chairperson’s Remarks
Vivek Kadambi, Ph.D., Senior Director, Drug Safety
Evaluation, Millennium Pharmaceuticals
2:20 Can Studies of Animal Idiosyncratic Drug
Toxicity Break the Unpredictability Log Jam for Human Serious Adverse Reactions?
John R. Senior, M.D., Associate Director for Science, Office of Surveillance
and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration
It’s believed that serious idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions in patients aren’t discovered in preclinical animal studies because they’re very rare, not predictable or dose-related and occur only in humans who are genetically extremely diverse. However, an increasing number of findings challenge these beliefs. This presentation uses drug-induced liver injury (DILI) as a model to elucidate why certain individual animals differ in response to the same dose-duration of drugs, which may allow earlier detection of rare human adverse drug toxicity.
3:00 How Well do Animal Models Predict
Adverse Effects in Humans?
Vivek Kadambi, Ph.D., Senior Director, Drug Safety Evaluation,
Millennium Pharmaceuticals
3:40 Predictive Preclinical Cardiosafety Assays
Martin Traebert, Ph.D., Head, Safety Pharmacology EU, Translational Sciences, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
Drug-induced long QT syndrome and potential cardiac arrhythmia are a major concern for patients, regulators and the pharmaceutical industry. Thus the preclinical identification of a potential cardiosafety liability needs to be addressed very carefully by a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays with increasing complexity. The most important assays (receptor binding studies, hERG electrophysiology, isolated cardiac tissue/organs and in vivo ECG recording) will be presented and discussed.
4:20 Reception in the Exhibit Hall
5:00 Breakout Discussions in the Exhibit Hall
Accelerating Technology Adoption in Preclinical Drug Safety
Moderator: Jack Reynolds, DVM, Chairman of the Advisory Board, The Drug Safety Executive
Council
-
How much does the 'Not Invented Here' mentality inhibit new technology assessment/implementation in your organization?
-
What can be done to lower the barriers for new technology or novel platform adoption?
-
Can we simplify the technology evaluation process?
-
Collaborative projects - is this the solution?
Animal Models and Idiosyncratic Toxicity
Co-Moderators: John R. Senior, M.D., Associate Director for Science, Offi ce of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration; and
Paul B. Watkins, M.D., Director of Hamner/U.N.C. Center for Drug SafetyScience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
-
Should current animal testing focus on outliers rather than mean responses (as is the case in assessing toxicity in clinical trials)
-
What is the potential of various animal models proposed to mimic idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions (eg. genetically modified mice, panels of inbred but genetically diverse mice)
-
Are these efforts just killing more harmless drugs?
Translational Safety Biomarkers
Moderator: William B. Mattes, Ph.D., D.A.B.T., Director of Toxicology, The Critical Path Institute
-
Recently the FDA and EMEA have qualified seven new biomarkers for sensitive detection of drug-
induced kidney injury. How do other safety biomarkers, applicable both in a non-clinical and in a clinical setting, improve the progression of candidates in drug development from discovery through clinical studies?
-
What other approaches and technologies may be applied for addressing safety issues at the preclinical-Phase 1 interface?
Evaluating and Improving Pre-Clinical Models
Moderator: Vivek Kadambi, Ph.D., Senior Director, Drug Safety Evaluation, Millennium Pharmaceuticals
-
How predictive are animal models of human response?
-
What are the “validation”
criteria for animal models?
-
What assays can be done in in vitro models?
-
How can human adverse reactions be predicted?
-
How to address variability in
animal models?
Cardiotoxicity Assays for
Preclinical Screening
Moderated by: Craig T. January, M.D., Ph.D., Professor,
Division of Cardiovascular, Medicine, University of
Wisconsin-Madison
Blake D. Anson, Ph.D., Director hERG Screening Services,
Cellular Dynamics International, Inc
-
limitations of current assays
-
new technologies on the horizon
-
adopting new technologies into your
screening programs
6:00 Close of Day
Overview
| Day 1
| Day 2
| Day 3
| Download
Brochure | Breakout
Discussions
For questions or suggestions about
the meeting, please contact:
Edel O'Regan
Cambridge Healthtech Institute
250 First Avenue, Suite #300
Needham, MA 02494
Tel: 781-972-5423
Fax: 781-972-5425
email: eoregan@healthtech.com
For sales information, contact:
Carol Dinerstein
Tel: 781-972-5471
email: Dinerstein@healthtech.com
OR
Jon Stroup
Tel: 781-972-5483
email: jstroup@healthtech.com
|


Premier
Sponsors


Corporate Sponsors



























Corporate Support
Sponsors


Media Partners

Co-Sponsors

|